cosmetics

clustering-louvain.cabal

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ cabal-version: 1.12
 --
 -- see: https://github.com/sol/hpack
 --
--- hash: 92999c9be9048a97745703a9575dcb38cea579137bd2a893acf77c708290b84e
+-- hash: 0eb2bbc80a3d9343540c4d5c0c2ff6adee085a9a75364b8f5344890891c5b781
 
 name:           clustering-louvain
 version:        0.1.0.0
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ library
       Data.Graph.Clustering.Louvain.CplusPlus
   other-modules:
       Data.Graph.Clustering.Example
+      Data.Graph.Clustering.FLouvain
       Data.Graph.Clustering.HLouvain
       Paths_clustering_louvain
   default-language: Haskell2010

src/Data/Graph/Clustering/HLouvain.hs

@@ -7,14 +7,15 @@ Maintainer  : alexandre.delanoe+louvain@iscpif.fr
 Stability   : experimental
 Portability : POSIX
 
-Clustering is not precise enought to work with (kmeans clustering is not
-the same methodology than Louvain clustering fo rinstance).
+Clustering is not precise enough to work with (kmeans clustering has not
+the same methodology than Louvain clustering fo instance, not speaking
+about the use of graph or not that is not the point).
 
 Here is a new semantic to change this situation.
 glustering vs klustering
 
 glustering: agglomerate according to glue rules (bottom up)
-klustering: split in k parts according to klue rules (top down)
+klustering: split       according to klue rules (top down)
 
 -}
 
@@ -65,8 +66,7 @@ comp g' = map sortNodes cs
   where
     sortNodes ns = case head $ sortOn (Down . (G.deg g)) ns of
       Nothing -> []
-      -- sort nodes by depth first to speed up the glustering
-      Just  n -> G.dfs [n] g
+      Just  n -> G.dfs [n] g  -- dfs for glustering, bfs for klustering
     cs = G.components g
     g  = G.undir g'
 
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ comp g' = map sortNodes cs
 -- are glusters with score of glue to build it.
 
 data Dendogram  = Gram Node
-                | Dendogram { gluster :: ![Dendogram]
+                | Dendogram { dends :: ![Dendogram] -- d-ends ends can be either glusters or klusters
                             , score :: !Double
                             }
   deriving (Show, Eq)
@@ -128,20 +128,28 @@ inDendo g d1@(Gram _) d2@(Gram _)   = Dendogram n' (hasScore g n')
   where
     ds = inDendo g d1 (toDendoD g d2)
     ss = hasScore g ds
-    n' | hasScore g d1 + hasScore g d2 > ss = [d1,d2]
-       | otherwise = [ds]
 
-inDendo g n@(Gram _) d@(Dendogram _ _) = inDendo g (toDendoD g n) d
+    s1 = hasScore g d1
+    s2 = hasScore g d2
+
+    n' = [d1,d2]
+{-
+    n' | s1 + s2 > ss = [d1,d2]
+       | otherwise    = [ds]
+-}
 
 inDendo g d@(Dendogram _ _) n@(Gram _) = inDendo g n d
+inDendo g n@(Gram _) d@(Dendogram _ _) = inDendo g (toDendoD g n) d
 
-inDendo g d1@(Dendogram _ _) d2@(Dendogram _ _) = Dendogram n' (hasScore g n')
+inDendo g d1@(Dendogram _ s1) d2@(Dendogram _ s2) = Dendogram n' (hasScore g n')
   where
     ds = inDendo g d1 d2
     ss = hasScore g ds
-    n' | hasScore g [d1, d2] > ss = [d1,d2]
+    n' = [ds]
+{-
+    n' | s1 + s2 > ss = [d1,d2]
        | otherwise    = [ds]
-
+-}
 -------------------------------------------------------------------
 nodesD :: Dendogram -> Set Node
 nodesD (Gram n)         = Set.singleton n