Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
    • Help
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
P
purescript-gargantext
  • Project
    • Project
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
    • Cycle Analytics
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
    • Charts
  • Issues 148
    • Issues 148
    • List
    • Board
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 1
    • Merge Requests 1
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
    • Charts
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Charts
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • gargantext
  • purescript-gargantext
  • Issues
  • #759

Closed
Open
Opened Oct 01, 2025 by david Chavalarias@davidchavalarias
  • Report abuse
  • New issue
Report abuse New issue

Regression on graphs

There seems to be a regression on graph visualization (since the adaptation to sigmaJS updates ? @karenkonou )

Links are very thin and some even seem to be at width=0 (see for example https://dev.sub.gargantext.org/#/share/NodeGraph/189445 )

image

Or maybe it's because of the addition of an alpha value. But even in this case, the witdh of the edges should be positive.

For most proximity measures, edges values are between 0 and 1, so width should be set to something like (a + b* edge_value) so that we can distinguish strong links from weak links.

Start testing with a=2 and b=5 and adjust according to the rendering. With an alpha on links of about 60% this should provide a good rendering.

Edited Oct 01, 2025 by david Chavalarias
Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
4
Labels
To Do high map/Graph regression
Assign labels
  • View project labels
Reference: gargantext/purescript-gargantext#759